2000 Ford Explorer XLT review from North America
"Solid, reliable SUV from Ford"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
The rear window wiper failed at 30k and was replaced under warranty.
Front brake pads were replaced at 55k -- but I consider this to be normal wear.
Of course, all of the tires were replaced as part of the Firestone roll-over debacle. No complaints here -- I got new tires free!!
Some stalling problems fixed by a thorough cleaning and servicing of the throttle body injection assembly, about $50 in your local shop.
General comments?
Excellent vehicle.
I purchased it used, a former lease / rental and was worried about how well it would hold up. Well, I've put over 40k miles on it and it runs great with minimal problems.
Keep in mind that the 2000 model had the solid rear axle, unlike the 4 wheel independent suspension you see on new Explorers, so these older models ride like trucks, which is what they are...
Also, even the upgrade V6 which is what I have, does not deliver a tremendous amount of power or torque, so would not recommend towing or drag strip racing. However, I'm satisfied with overall performance, but consider the 5.0L V8 if you need more power.
Recommended Reviews:
![]() ![]() | Good 2 people SUV |
![]() ![]() | Watch out for radio interference problems, present in most Ford vehicles since 1990 |
All 2000 Ford Explorer reviews
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 2001 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | 4.0 OHV Automatic |
| Performance marks | 8/10 |
| Reliability marks | 9/10 |
| Comfort marks | 7/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 8/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 7/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 24000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 69000 miles |
| Previous car | Nissan Maxima |
| Date of Entry | 13th July, 2003 |

