Similar Chevrolet Cavalier reviews

2002
USA FlagCanada Flag

Cavalier LS Sport

Fine car

13 words
2001
USA FlagCanada Flag

Cavalier Z24

The Z24 is fun, but other Cavaliers are more reliable

435 words
USA FlagCanada Flag

Cavalier Coupe (base)

Good transport (even fun), but questionable reliability

408 words
USA FlagCanada Flag

Cavalier Base

Cheap transport, but be prepared for subpar quality and reliability

371 words
USA FlagCanada Flag

Cavalier

This car is a headache

366 words
USA FlagCanada Flag

Cavalier Z-24

Reserved At this point

355 words
USA FlagCanada Flag

Cavalier L

Never another GM

345 words
All Chevrolet Cavalier reviews

2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Base review from North America

"Cheap transport, but be prepared for subpar quality and reliability"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Started using oil @ 85,000kms.

Rear struts @ 95,000kms.

Front struts @ 100,000kms.

Drivers seat @ 90,000kms.

Rear hubs @ 95,000kms.

Wheel alignment (x2) @ 97,000kms.

Wind whistle and drivetrain vibration/wine @ 90,000kms.

General comments?

This has been an alright car despite the list of faults. I bought it as a 'buy back' @ 81k as I needed a car for school and it was what I could afford. I knew from previous GM products experience I would be putting up with a high repair rate and subpar craftsmanship, but I still ruled to go with this 'deal'. Overall I guess the Cavalier has served its purpose of being basic transport with a few frills (mine has Air, Tilt, Cruise, AM/FM/CD, and powerlocks with keyless entry). The drivetrain is good, though a little trashy under acceleration, and I have bested a 46 mpg on a roadtrip last summer shortly after purchase (110km/h (68mph), +35*C, (approx. 95*F), A/C on medium or low, and all highway). That was before the problems ensued.

To be fair it was in a bad wreck where an SUV ran into the left side. Although it was repaired I'm still questioning if it should have gone for salvage. This may have attributed to the struts, wheel alignment and hubs, but its questionable. My GM experience has been they fall apart @ 100,000km (approx. 60,000 miles) and this car yet confirms it.

As far as ride and ergonaumics go this is my first car (I've owned several trucks), so I am quite impressed with the handling, power, and fuel mileage, but my pal's imports and Ford Focus' all kill this one relentlessly. The interior and such is nicer then some, but not as nice as most, and the seats are typical of economy cars. The build quality on the whole car as mentioned is subpar. Overall I have to say that this is an OK car for the money, and will likely do the trick as long as I need it, which is about another half dozen years.

Given the choice of another tomorrow though I would find a way to get an import, even if it meant losing years and gaining odometer mileage, and thus buy some reliability and longevity.

2 comments

Recommended reviews

USA FlagCanada Flag

2001 - Cavalier Coupe (base) 2.2L

Good transport (even fun), but questionable reliability

USA FlagCanada Flag

2001 - Cavalier

This car is a headache

All 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier reviews

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No
Model Year2001
First year of ownership2005
Most recent year of ownership2006
Engine and transmission 2.2L Automatic
Performance marks 8/10
Reliability marks 2/10
Comfort marks 4/10
Dealer Service marks 9/10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 2/10
Distance when acquired81000 kilometres
Most recent distance101000 kilometres
Previous carFord Ranger
Date of Entry 24th March, 2006

All Chevrolet Cavalier reviews