2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser Reviews - Page 8 of 9

3rd Dec 2004, 07:48

The convertible model PT's are pretty nice.

Especially either of the turbo models.

2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser Limited Edition non-turbo 4 banger from North America

Year of manufacture	2003
First year of ownership	2003
Most recent year of ownership	2004
Engine and transmission	non-turbo 4 banger Automatic
Performance marks	6 / 10
Reliability marks	10 / 10
Comfort marks	8 / 10
Dealer Service marks	10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper)	5 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)	7.8 / 10
Distance when acquired	0 miles
Most recent distance	19000 miles
Previous car	Jaguar XJS

Summary:

Looks cool and runs well, but very thirsty

Faults:

Nothing has gone wrong; it is a very reliable car.

General Comments:

The car gets terrible gas mileage.

I bought this vehicle to drive to work and save my Jaguar XJS from things like snow and salt. I know it isn't a fair comparison in many ways, but I think it is a notable point that my 6-cylinder 4 litre British grand tourer delivers a solid 26-28 miles per gallon while the Cruiser struggles to achieve 23.

Handling is mediocre, but I'm spoiled in that department.

I love the style of the little beast, though, and the interior is great.

Chrysler designed a great deal of efficient space into the Cruiser. It is very versatile.

I would stand in line to buy one with a hybrid engine.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 10th March, 2004

17th Apr 2004, 07:07

Well, gas mileage depends on your driving habits. Yes, if you constantly drive like your're in the Indy 500, you are going to have poor mileage. If you only drive like that on occasion, you're going to have better mileage.

19th Jul 2004, 20:33

Best trip mileage we could get was 26 mpg (accurately checked). Disapointing.

20th Jul 2004, 06:30

I agree totally on the mileage issue. My PT is used for daily commutes to work of 13 miles each way (country roads), with an occasional run on the turnpike every few weeks. It doesn't matter - my mileage ALWAYS hovers around 21-23 mpg, with better mileage in summer than winter. I read the owners manual - the PT's curb weight is over 3200 pounds - which is more than likely the reason for the mediocre gas usage. But I still love my PT - I wouldn't trade it for anything!

20th Mar 2005, 11:20

I love my Cruiser! Now, having said that, there are times (especially at the gas pumps) that I wish I'd never bought it. I was "caught" by the looks and feel when driving. I was driving a 10 year old van with over 100,000 miles before and it got close to 30 mpg. Imagine my surprise when I could only reach 19 mpg in country road, winter driving. True, it does better on highway driving (22-26mpg). Especially in the spring and fall when you don't need the heater or air conditioner.

I was just chalking up the bad gas mileage to the fact that I bought the car on Sept 11, 2001. Bad vibes that day!!! But that excuse can only go on for so long.

A hybrid would be interesting (and appealing) but this is the last time I splurge on "looks and feel". Next time it will be economy and practicality.

If gas money is not an issue to you, then get a Cruiser. You'll love it!

2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser GT Turbo turbo from North America

Year of manufacture	2003
First year of ownership	2003
Most recent year of ownership	2004
Engine and transmission	turbo Automatic
Performance marks	8 / 10
Reliability marks	1 / 10
Comfort marks	5 / 10
Dealer Service marks	10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper)	7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)	6.2 / 10
Distance when acquired	0 kilometres
Most recent distance	27000 kilometres
Previous car	Nissan Pathfinder

Summary:

Fun, but a lemon

Faults:

Power Steering pump, various electrical problems, spark plug wires, locking mechanism.

General Comments:

I enjoy driving it, but frankly I think the quality of the car bites. I will not buyer another Chrysler again.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 22nd February, 2004

2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser Limited Edition from North America

Year of manufacture	2003
First year of ownership	2003
Most recent year of ownership	2003
Engine and transmission	Automatic
Performance marks	10 / 10
Reliability marks	10 / 10
Comfort marks	10 / 10
Dealer Service marks	9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper)	7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)	9.2 / 10
Distance when acquired	35 kilometres
Most recent distance	7452 kilometres
Previous car	Chrysler Shadow

Summary:

The most fantastic car I have ever owned

General Comments:

This car has so much room inside and the headroom is more than enough.

The headlights are are fantastic.

I love this entire car from front to back.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 14th October, 2003