2006 BMW 3 Series Reviews

2006 BMW 3 Series 320i 2.0L petrol from Australia and New Zealand

Model year2006
Year of manufacture2006
First year of ownership2011
Most recent year of ownership2014
Engine and transmission 2.0L petrol Automatic
Performance marks 6 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Dealer Service marks 4 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.2 / 10
Distance when acquired74000 kilometres
Most recent distance127000 kilometres
Previous carBMW 5 Series

Summary:

Great entry level luxury cars

Faults:

Engine had a minor leak - was seals, which have now been replaced.

Wheel bearing at 104k - was at a very minor stage, but I can't sleep at night if things are not perfect in my car, so I got it done.

Shifting gears at times was rough, but a software update seems to have fixed this issue.

General Comments:

Before I get distracted, as I recently bought a Lexus V8 (trying something different and am loving it), I thought I'd write up a review so my head is still focused on this. I have written about 4 BMW reviews here and have owned about 17 of them over the last 15 years. At times I had 2 at once. I have owned E30, E36, E46, E90, E39 and E60 models. Can't afford an F30 yet. The models I had were the 318, 320, 323, 325, 328 520, 528 and 530 from the years 1988 to 2008.

So as everyone says - you notice the real BMW when you buy a 6 cylinder version, which I tend to support, but for economy and simplicity, a basic 4 cylinder car like a 320i is a great choice. However 323 versions are actually a tempting choice for a wee bit more, but a 320i will fit in well for low end budget fine.

I have owned 2x E90 until now. The first one was a 2005, but I wanted a sunroof so bought a 2006 version, which is exactly the same car, but has a sunroof. They both drive exactly the same, and all features seem to be the same – memory seat, auto light, angel headlights etc.

Due to the 320i being the base platform like Toyota has the Corolla – these are relatively simpler to fix, lots of parts are available, and depreciation is reasonable compared to high end models, and there's a lot less things to go wrong. The chances of you picking up a decent one are high, as there are many of them around, and they are not really the type of car where people can have lots of fun trashing them, so luck is more likely to be on your side.

I do about 70-80k a year, but my company car takes the hit as they are work related, but my personal driving would be from Rotorua to Auckland every weekend, and that's where the BMW gets used.

The first logical thing to talk about when you mention about driving amount would be fuel consumption. I would rate it very well on the open road and reasonable in town. I am 30 now, but I drive maturely, which means no trashing, and do look after the car well. The best I have got was 5.9L to 100km. Otherwise between 6.8-7.5 litres per 100 on the open road. In the city it does about 10-11 litres to 100km on Auckland roads. Thumbs up from an E46 model on the economy side, especially on the open road part. I owned a E46 99 BMW NZ new back in 2006 for few years, which I am comparing it with. Higher specs like the 323, 325 or 328 do very well on the open road as well, but the difference you notice is in city driving, and the E90 320i does it quite well.

Handling is truly great. Yes it lacks power compared to its elder brothers, who have more meat, but for a 2L I think it performs well compared to many other cars I have driven (I have driven over 200 cars, if not more, and I love cars just as much I love my girlfriend, ha ha, so it's a hobby, I'm not trying to exaggerate). It's a known fact that a BMW is a driver's car, and the E90 shape has improved aerodynamics, hence it seems to sail thru comfortably compared to the E46, E36 and E30 models I have owned.

The E90 feels roomier compare to the E46. I do like the interior now, but when it was first released, I thought the E46 had more kicks to it when it was released. I feel the seats are a bit too low, so not very comfy to get in and out, but once you get in the car – you feel very comfy. A downside is the rear visibility. Having high rear seat headrests and a smaller rear windshield can be painful sometimes, hence a rear view camera or parking sensor can become handy at times. The cabin is well insulated, but I have noticed few odd squeaky noises, which I still can't figure out where they're coming from. Please bear in mind that mine is a Japanese import.

RFT (Run flat tyres) are good in theory, but wear out quick and are very expensive, hence I changed to standard (although I run the risk of not having a spare, but hey that's why I have AA membership ;) ). RFT also introduces road noise. After doing the change, I have been noticing less noise in the cabin compared to before.

2.0L engines are still a bit noisy, and I would say there is a room for improvement there. Overall it has been a good car with no major complaints. If you do plan to own one, my recommendation is:

1) Buy NZ new or non-Singapore import with service history if possible. Otherwise get it inspected before buying.

2) Flush the transmission fluid every 100k (don't get confused about BMW's mixed message – it's a must. BMW's auto gearbox and electronics are generally the weakest link of the chain).

3) Service religiously every 10k, even if they say 15k will be fine (just to be on the safe side).

4) Check for oil leaks and fix them before you start using it.

5) Most import cars seem to have old software, and updating it does make an improvement, which you will notice, and also improves fuel economy.

Now what I have said here is my personal opinion only, some of you may not agree, but all of us has different experiences based on what we owned right? So it was just my view, and I'm happy to hear what your experience has taught you. I have moved to a Lexus V8, but that doesn't mean I won't buy another BMW. Each car maker has their own taste to offer, but overall I vote BMW over Audi (yes, I have owned the B5 and B6 platform as well for few months each) for the reliability, handling and comfort factors. Looks and interior will go to Audi, and again that is my personal preference.

So in conclusion, the 320i is very reliable unless you have bought a lemon. Yes, it is not a Corolla or Civic, so do expect higher bills, but it's still cheap for an entry level luxury car.

Currently you can pick up a 2005 onwards 320i that's done under 100k for below 15k in NZ, which is a great value for a lot of car. I would recommend trying one out. Any questions – I'm happy to answer.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 27th January, 2014

28th Jan 2014, 17:49

Thanks for the review - reasonable time of ownership and mileage driven. I'm thinking of eventually replacing my current 316ti Compact with one of these eventually, but will gun for the rarer 320i manual cars from Japan (which I observe to be of a low-level trim - no foglamps, hence no heated mirrors, no cruise control, often on hubcaps, low-spec cloth, no steering wheel audio controls, and has manual climate control, which doesn't really bother me).

I've driven the automatic version almost new in 2006, and first noticed that the 4-cyl engine is noticeably noisier, almost thought it was a diesel. I was told by the mechanic it's because of Valvetronic.

The one I drove had steering lighter than I was accustomed to, which was a bit worrying, but a more recent one I drove had that hefty, heavier steering feel I like. The car I drove seemed noisier inside too - and then again you mentioned changing to non-runflats improved the situation. That would be important for me, because driving on coarse-chip country roads in many cars creates a drone that fatigues me.

The one-touch indicators initially drove me nuts, but have gotten used to them of late, since a few more cars I've driven have them.

Agreed with your observation of the Lexus and Audi. I have had a string of used Audis, and they do have nicer interiors, and are more of a cruiser than a BMW, although the suspension isn't too shabby. The ambiance inside a typical Audi makes you feel more pampered and relaxed; the BMWs tend to be more businesslike. The Lexus is really a comfortable car, and that should be very reliable too. You can't expect it to be too frugal though - it's a heavy car.

Keep us posted - long-term experiences regarding possible common problems are useful. Often these can be easily rectified or prevented.

17th Mar 2014, 23:43

Totally agree mate. The engine is very noisy on the 2.0L, but I would recommend a manual. My auto box is playing up again. Also, servicing it is not cheap. Japanese imports are good as long as the Ks there are genuine and they're well looked after. Mine came with fog lamp, sunroof, but no cruise control generally with the 2.0 version. With adding few more Ks, a 323 or 325 is a good option. A lot more options, and it's a complete different league.

As you said - Audis are great, but handling wise BMW still rules. I am currently having some reliability issues however, to keep you posted.

Some oil leaks from 3 areas. Done about 10 more Ks since then. Gear box started to slip from second to third. Also the left indicator doesn't come back after turning, which is minor.

So not very happy with it at the moment. Deciding whether to keep it longer or sell it as when things starts going wrong - it's not cheap.

18th Mar 2014, 13:48

When you're up in Auckland, take it to Burger's Motor Works, see what he says. He may know of common faults, or those problems you have may be rectified with a software upgrade (for the gearbox, that is).

23rd Mar 2014, 19:14

I'll surely try. Many thanks. I have taken to European autos and they have updated my software, but that didn't have any impact. I'm little upset over this, as it sits at back of your mind that your car is not 100%. I'll google them up and get their contacts to see them on my next trip.

Many thanks again.

2006 BMW 3 Series 325i mSport 2.5 straight six from UK and Ireland

Year of manufacture2006
First year of ownership2011
Engine and transmission 2.5 straight six Manual
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.8 / 10
Distance when acquired37000 miles
Most recent distance42000 miles
Previous carHonda Accord

Summary:

Brilliant all rounder

Faults:

I had a warning light on the dashboard, which after some research, looked like a traction control issue. It was raining heavily at the time. The fault disappeared and hasn't been back since, leading me to think that it may have been a damp sensor.

General Comments:

Quick and smooth engine mated to a good gear change and sublime chassis. The car handles like a smaller hot hatch. There's loads of grip, but when the back end steps out on wet roundabouts, it's so easy to get back. It's fun without being scary for drivers who are not professional racers!

The ride isn't great (coming from a Honda Accord exec) but it's the mSport version with hard suspension and run flats. Saying that, it's not as bad as some people make out.

Seats are superb, with plenty of support and adjustment options.

I love some of the features like the door handles lighting up, button press folding mirrors, near side mirror automatically points to the curb when in reverse, and overall, the interior quality is just better than the alternatives from Japan and France.

Things I don't like: The radio isn't great for a prestige car, the sound is average at best. The computer is not the most intuitive. I can reset the average MPG from the stalk, but I'm yet to discover how to reset the trip computer!

Overall, I love this car. It's the RWD handling, smooth engine, and sporty feel. I couldn't go back to an executive type car unless I had the money for a toy as well as.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 3rd November, 2011

25th Nov 2011, 13:04

Tiny, unlabelled button to the bottom left of the speedo to reset the trip meter. Had me confused for a bit as well :-)

When the fuel gauge is at zero, follow the line of the needle.

Average review marks: 7.0 / 10, based on 15 reviews