1991 Chevrolet Cavalier Reviews

1991 Chevrolet Cavalier Z24 Convertible 3.1 from North America

Model year1991
Year of manufacture1991
First year of ownership2001
Most recent year of ownership2004
Engine and transmission 3.1 Automatic
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 7 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 5 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.3 / 10

Summary:

Pay extra for one in great shape, and you'll be happy

Faults:

Seals in hydraulic cylinders for power roof, A/C, quarter glass trim rusts away, rear glass window separates from roof.

General Comments:

Owned '89, '91, '93 and '99 Z24 ragtops. Custom and original.

Never buy one with a VIN# starting with 3. They're made in Mexico and rust severely in Canada. '92-'94 are the best ones! Better interior, looks, 3.1, better door trim, P/W switches, roof, etc.

You have to love ragtops. I do, and love this car.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 18th February, 2013

1991 Chevrolet Cavalier from North America

Model year1991
Year of manufacture1991
First year of ownership1999
Most recent year of ownership2005
Engine and transmission Automatic
Performance marks 5 / 10
Reliability marks 0 / 10
Comfort marks 5 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
5.0 / 10
Distance when acquired150000 kilometres
Most recent distance202000 kilometres
Previous carFord F100

Summary:

Bad dream

Faults:

Head gasket after 1500k.

Computer after 1000k.

Water pumps; 5 in one year.

Belt tensioner x 2.

Radiator.

Heater core.

Timing chain.

Ignition sensor.

Seat spring popped out. Sharp.

Etc etc etc.

General Comments:

Car was purchased by wife through her dad's friend's car lot.

Things kept escalating with repairs to the point where it was towed to junk yard and I'd lose the $7000 to $8000 invested in the car in just over a year. The other option was to keep repairing it.

The last straw was when the car died again. Towed to a mechanic. Replaced ignition sensor.

2 weeks later, it dies in a snow storm again.

Towed back to mechanic. Puts in an ignition module.

Dies one week later. Back to mechanic. Chain is gone and now an additional $1000 dollar repair bill.

Towed it home. Got discount from the driver because I was such a repeat customer and the mechanic paid for another tow. Could not give the car away. Towed to junk yard.

My parts friend calls them "Crapoliers." He's been in the business for 40 years.

Nuff said.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 8th July, 2010

1991 Chevrolet Cavalier VL 2.2 from North America

Year of manufacture1991
First year of ownership1991
Most recent year of ownership1999
Engine and transmission 2.2 Manual
Performance marks 5 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Dealer Service marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 9 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.0 / 10
Distance when acquired15 miles
Most recent distance135000 miles
Previous carChevrolet Impala

Faults:

Sensor, 68000 miles.

Shifter boot, 114,000 miles.

Battery, 130,000 miles.

General Comments:

Bought the VL coupe brand new for under $7,000 + 795 for extended warranty. I'm still kicking myself for that because I never had to use it.

Loved the dash, although I wished that it had a tachometer, but hey, for that kind of money?

Considering the price I paid, the engine, 5-speed transmission, distributor-less ignition, hydraulically actuated clutch, stainless steel exhaust system, styling, solid handling, great economy, fun to drive, all these were beyond my expectations.

The car proved extremely reliable, I experienced the first major trouble after 7 years at 130,000 miles when the original battery gave up.

The car was not garaged most of the time and began losing its luster. It was time to move on anyway, but I still have fond memories.

This was one great car, I don't understand why the press gave it such bad rap.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 7th February, 2009

1991 Chevrolet Cavalier Z24 3.1 from North America

Model year1991
Year of manufacture1991
First year of ownership2007
Most recent year of ownership2008
Engine and transmission 3.1 Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 4 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.6 / 10
Distance when acquired160000 miles
Most recent distance175000 miles
Previous carPontiac Sunfire

Summary:

Chevy never lets me down

Faults:

I do all my own work, don't trust others with my pride and joy.

Alternator was replaced after the bearing went out in it.

The water pump was leaking and replaced.

The engine overheated, new thermostat was put in.

The clutch was going out when I bought it, so drove it until it had to be redone.

New tires, sway bar links, and lower ball joints were put in last week.

The rear brakes and parking brake cables were replaced at the same time.

I welded the parking brake handle back together after it broke in the console.

The sunroof leaks a little, but that is no big deal.

The plastic is cracked on the console.

The doors are starting to rust, but that is because the MN winters and salt.

General Comments:

I love my car very much. It is my best friend and never lets me down.

I knew the guy I bought it from, and told him that if he ever sold it I wanted it. I bought it for $400. It is the best car I have ever had, and for the best price.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 23rd July, 2008

1991 Chevrolet Cavalier RS 2.2 Litre throttle body inj. from North America

Model year1991
Year of manufacture1991
Engine and transmission 2.2 Litre throttle body inj. Automatic
Performance marks 10 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 10 / 10
Dealer Service marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
9.8 / 10
Distance when acquired0 miles
Most recent distance146000 miles
Previous carChevrolet Camaro

Summary:

The World's First True Sports Sedan!

Faults:

Brakes, hoses, usual wear items.

General Comments:

My prior car was a 69 Camaro RS and as I started a family I decided to opt for a sporty four door. This was tough to find until I discovered the Cavalier RS (Rally Sport). This has been a great car in terms of performance and practicality. The completely stock 2.2 litre engine is quite powerful and I recently clocked the standing start quarter mile @ 14.1 seconds @ 104 miles per hour. Where it really shines is in cornering with its advanced MacPherson strut suspension. I realize there are faster cars out there, but not in this price range!

Leave it to Chevy to market a practical yet sporty four door that blows the doors off the competition!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 19th August, 2006

21st Aug 2006, 08:03

A lot of small economy compact cars have the MacPherson setup. Its nothing advanced.

30th Aug 2006, 14:21

The prior comment is true, many cars had Mac Pherson strut suspension, however, GM had the most exacting specifications and tuned the struts just right, which helped make the Cavalier one of the best handling sports car of the decade!

2nd Oct 2006, 14:23

I also own a Cavalier RS and I must say it handles and drives like an exotic European Sports Car! Consequently, Cavalier's from the early 90's and earlier are becoming quite collectible.

21st Jan 2007, 22:08

Um, I'm sorry, but no matter how fast you think it is, a 95hp 4-cyl dead stock with a 3-speed auto can't do a 14.1 in the 1/4, maybe it could do that in the 1/8th mile if you were lucky. This is actually one of the slowest cars I've ever driven, and I think many owners can agree with me. You're either joking or the drag strip where you ran it was messing with you.

18th Nov 2009, 22:32

For one an 1/8 mile is shorter than a 1/4 mile, and yes it will. I have a 5 speed Cavy and it will do that in that amount of time, and yes mine has the 2.2 liter in it too.

19th Nov 2009, 14:35

I am sorry but I must say that the Cavalier in any shape or form is certainly NOT a "sports car", nor is it even remotely "The World's First True Sports Sedan!". It is an economy car - nothing more.

Average review marks: 7.0 / 10, based on 33 reviews