1992 Ford Taurus GL 3.0 V6 from North America

Summary:

Reliable and gorgeous

Faults:

Starter solenoid went out at 71,000.

General Comments:

I love my Taurus. I bought it for 800 dollars. Nothing was wrong with it, and there still is not.

The only problem I've had in the three years I've owned it, was my solenoid on the starter, which was about 40 dollars. I fixed it myself, and I am definitely not a mechanic.

I would recommend this car to anyone. They are not pricey at all, but they are extremely reliable. Plus they are very good looking. Think about how many you see everyday on the roads... you know they are reliable. Do not kid yourself.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 24th July, 2006

25th Jul 2006, 15:15

We had 175,000 miles on our '92 before being totalled in a rear-end collision, and it still ran and drove without a hitch, even after 175k and being declared a total loss! So plan on yours being around for awhile and know that you got yourself a damn good car. (The 3.0 is a reliable engine, but stay away from the 3.8 Taurus, nothing, but trouble..)

1992 Ford Taurus GL 3.0 V6 from North America

Summary:

Stylish, Good Performance, Reliable, but costly to maintain

Faults:

The same week I purchased the car from a Ford dealership, the water pump went out (about 67,000 miles).

Shortly thereafter, I had to replace the starter and the radiator (both before 75,000 miles).

I constantly had expensive repairs to replace the brakes. Every time I took the car to get the brake pads replaced, something was damaged with the break system and the repairs were always $300 or $400.

The rear brake lights also went out several times - there was some sort of wiring problem that could never seem to get fixed. I got tired of spending the money trying to fix it, so I just adjusted to driving with no rear brake lights.

The heater core went out at around 150,000 miles, but I never fixed this as it would have been several hundred dollars (I am from Arizona - not that cold anyway!).

And there were several other items that went out such as the cruise control, the windshield wipers, etc. (all of these started to fail at around 100,000 miles - some I fixed, some I didn't).

Service records before I purchased the car indicated that the transmission had been replaced at about 60,000 miles. The other repairs listed were mostly routine maintenance.

General Comments:

It's a mixed review for me. I loved this car when I bought it. I had just got married and was planning to start a family and this car's styling was a nice mix of a family sedan, yet still with a sporty look. I was impressed with the car's power, it would definitely get up and move for a sedan. A lot of strong acceleration for passing too. And the ride was very comfortable. So high points for styling and comfort. Plus despite all the problems I had with the car, it did last up to 190,000 miles and was still running albeit not as well as before, when I traded it in on a Nissan Altima.

On the negative side, there were problems that seemed to not get fixed (i.e. the brake lights, break system) these things were constant annoyances and quite expensive in terms of the break system. However, the car was reliable in that it started up every time. And durable, lasting 190,000 miles plus. And I did drive the car hard, putting 130,000 miles on it in less than 6 years including vacations from Arizona to California and from Arizona to Texas.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 13th February, 2006

1992 Ford Taurus SHO 3.0L from North America

Summary:

Overall, if you can find a well taken care of SHO in good condition, it's a great car

Faults:

Brakes caliper in right rear froze up, water pump leaking slighty, rie-rod ends worn and electrical seat adjustment failed.

General Comments:

Great car for the history. I purchased the car with amazing mileage and have taken great care of it. With almost 90K miles, the original rotors are still on and in great shape.

Car handles great for a stock sedan.

Seats are comfortable, but the leather is wearing, but what do you expect from a 13 year old car?!

Engine is still running strong, great acceleration.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 7th October, 2005