2008 Honda Civic Reviews - Page 8 of 11

2008 Honda Civic DX-A 1.8 from North America

Model year2008
Year of manufacture2008
First year of ownership2008
Most recent year of ownership2008
Engine and transmission 1.8 Manual
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 4 / 10
Dealer Service marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 5 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.0 / 10
Distance when acquired19 kilometres
Most recent distance5200 kilometres
Previous carChevrolet Caprice

Summary:

Reliability is not everything

Faults:

Not a thing.

General Comments:

Reliable but absolutely not comfortable.

My young sons love it as it is definitely made for them, if you take the look and the design of the body and digitalized dashboard.

This tiny car is only good for fuel economy and a good means of transportation, but if I want to go on vacation, I will definitely not in any way take this car. It's too hard on my old body and ears.

I wanted to do like many have told me. But after months of owning this car, I think I will sell it to one of my sons, who will enjoy this little tiny uncomfortable car, and I'll buy a big American car like I use to have, even knowing they are less reliable but enjoyable. I am a real car lover, not an user.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 26th October, 2008

4th Apr 2009, 06:35

Comfort is definitely in the eye of the beholder. I find these cars comfortable. They make you know about every bump they cross, but they are still more comfortable to ride in than an earlier Civic or it's competitors. No small car has the seagoing ride of a big American car, but they're not meant to. I found these cars to be comfortable.

2008 Honda Civic Type R 2.0 i-VTEC from UK and Ireland

Model year2008
Year of manufacture2008
First year of ownership2008
Most recent year of ownership2008
Engine and transmission 2.0 i-VTEC Manual
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.4 / 10
Distance when acquired700 miles
Most recent distance2000 miles
Previous carFord Mondeo

Summary:

Fantastic little ballistic missile

Faults:

Nothing, although too new to comment in the case of my vehicle. A friend owns an identical make, model and trim level but with 12,500 miles on. He has had the grand total of zero problems with his.

General Comments:

Having been on the lookout for quite some time for a second car, and after many months of careful research and trips to the BMW, Ford and Vauxhall forecourts, we found ourselves at the local Honda dealership.

Climbing into the Type R on the test drive, one of the first things that was immediately striking was the interior. It's very funky looking, nicely laid out, and it's clear Honda have put a lot of thought into focusing the experience around the driver, with every control placed exactly and intuitively where you'd expect to find it.

Once driving the Type R it was immediately clear to me that despite lacking the immediate torque I'd been spoilt with in previous cars, the little Honda did something very special. It was more involving to drive.

Climbing behind the wheel of most modern (and usually turbocharged) 200bhp cars, I have found in my experience that they are *too* effortless to drive. My 54 plate Astra Coupe Turbo was blisteringly quick, but required no more involvement than pushing your foot to the floor in order to pick up tremendous speed. You'd find yourself constantly backing off on the throttle as the speed limit came up all to quickly. This is a stark contrast to the Type R. The Type R does require working harder to get the performance, but in my opinion, is all the better for it.

Day to day, drive the Civic Type R gently, and the car behaves like a normal 2.0 litre. Brisk pace is easily achievable without working the engine hard. Bury your foot in the throttle however, and start making use of the VTEC unit, and the driver is rewarded with a growl and raucous engine noise, and raspy exhaust note, as the car quickly picks up pace.

0-60 times for this car are published figures of 6.4 seconds, and I have no reason to disbelieve the figures. Being 200kg lighter than most of it's key rivals means that despite the lack of torque compared to the Astra VXR, Focus ST and Golf GTi, the car is extremely quick off the line.

From a handling perspective, the car will change direction on a postage stamp. The steering is very direct and precise, and the vehicle remains stable while being chucked into corners, giving immediate driver confidence in the car's handling. There is also plenty of feel through the seats, steering and pedals letting you know exactly where the line is at all times. Push the car over it's limits of grip, and the car will gracefully transition into gentle under-steer. The Vehicle Stability Assist has been set up by Honda to allow the driver to have 'more fun' before stepping in, and works very nicely, never feeling intrusive, but ready to correct anything too over zealous.

Issues I have found with the car are few and far between. A couple of criticisms however, include the brakes and the stereo.

The issue with the brakes isn't one of safety per say, but if the driver wished to take the car on a track day or similar, they would want to buy an aftermarket brake upgrade, as when pushed, I found the car suffered badly from brake fade. I'm not an expert on car mechanics, but I suspect grooved and vented discs should have been fitted on this car as standard to help mitigate this issue.

Our other car is a Ford Mondeo ST. The stereo in this vehicle is fantastic, plenty of bass, and very punchy, with a clear well rounded sound even at low volume. Sadly the Civic's stereo lacks the punch or the clarity of Ford's Sony unit. More noticeable perhaps because of the heavy metal that usually blares loudly whilst I'm driving.

In summary, I would definitely recommend the Type R to anyone looking at a performance hot hatch. Most dealerships now fit the Type R with an aftermarket Tracker at no cost to the owner, although not all do. Buy one from a dealer that does and you'll save yourself £400. Insuring the vehicle at age 29 with 7 years no claims, a clean license, and the tracker (in a nice area of town) and parking my car on the driveway at night has brought my insurance in at £470 per year. Not bad for a group 17 insurance vehicle.

If you are lucky enough to have the money in your early 20s to be buying one of these, *do* check the insurance out before buying. I've heard horror stories of £1700-2500 per year to insure.

I hope this review will be useful to anyone looking seriously at owning one of these. Enjoy.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 28th September, 2008

12th Oct 2008, 13:02

I have had a 2000 Honda Civic V-tec and 98 Civic 1.5, and am a great Honda fan. The Civic Type-R is definitely my new choice. Go Hondaaaa!!!

13th Aug 2009, 05:47

This isn't a very good car first of all...

The lock-to-lock turning circle is very poor on our Australian road.

The car is heavy for a "Type R", which weighs 1345kg.

The car understeers so much when pushing it at corners.

The rear suspension uses a torsion beam setup which is utterly disappointing.

The only good thing about this car is the riding comfort if you're a big fan of the Type-R series; it's still as firm as ever, and most of all the aggressive low-slung frontal looks of the car.

All-in-all I'm very disappointed that we Australians even purchased this vehicle. Honda Australia didn't do a very good job. The EK9 and EP3 Type-R's would've had more fans than this FN2 model.

Average review marks: 6.9 / 10, based on 28 reviews