2008 Honda Civic Reviews - Page 8 of 10

2008 Honda Civic Type R 2.0 i-VTEC from UK and Ireland

Model year2008
Year of manufacture2008
First year of ownership2008
Most recent year of ownership2008
Engine and transmission 2.0 i-VTEC Manual
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.4 / 10
Distance when acquired700 miles
Most recent distance2000 miles
Previous carFord Mondeo

Summary:

Fantastic little ballistic missile

Faults:

Nothing, although too new to comment in the case of my vehicle. A friend owns an identical make, model and trim level but with 12,500 miles on. He has had the grand total of zero problems with his.

General Comments:

Having been on the lookout for quite some time for a second car, and after many months of careful research and trips to the BMW, Ford and Vauxhall forecourts, we found ourselves at the local Honda dealership.

Climbing into the Type R on the test drive, one of the first things that was immediately striking was the interior. It's very funky looking, nicely laid out, and it's clear Honda have put a lot of thought into focusing the experience around the driver, with every control placed exactly and intuitively where you'd expect to find it.

Once driving the Type R it was immediately clear to me that despite lacking the immediate torque I'd been spoilt with in previous cars, the little Honda did something very special. It was more involving to drive.

Climbing behind the wheel of most modern (and usually turbocharged) 200bhp cars, I have found in my experience that they are *too* effortless to drive. My 54 plate Astra Coupe Turbo was blisteringly quick, but required no more involvement than pushing your foot to the floor in order to pick up tremendous speed. You'd find yourself constantly backing off on the throttle as the speed limit came up all to quickly. This is a stark contrast to the Type R. The Type R does require working harder to get the performance, but in my opinion, is all the better for it.

Day to day, drive the Civic Type R gently, and the car behaves like a normal 2.0 litre. Brisk pace is easily achievable without working the engine hard. Bury your foot in the throttle however, and start making use of the VTEC unit, and the driver is rewarded with a growl and raucous engine noise, and raspy exhaust note, as the car quickly picks up pace.

0-60 times for this car are published figures of 6.4 seconds, and I have no reason to disbelieve the figures. Being 200kg lighter than most of it's key rivals means that despite the lack of torque compared to the Astra VXR, Focus ST and Golf GTi, the car is extremely quick off the line.

From a handling perspective, the car will change direction on a postage stamp. The steering is very direct and precise, and the vehicle remains stable while being chucked into corners, giving immediate driver confidence in the car's handling. There is also plenty of feel through the seats, steering and pedals letting you know exactly where the line is at all times. Push the car over it's limits of grip, and the car will gracefully transition into gentle under-steer. The Vehicle Stability Assist has been set up by Honda to allow the driver to have 'more fun' before stepping in, and works very nicely, never feeling intrusive, but ready to correct anything too over zealous.

Issues I have found with the car are few and far between. A couple of criticisms however, include the brakes and the stereo.

The issue with the brakes isn't one of safety per say, but if the driver wished to take the car on a track day or similar, they would want to buy an aftermarket brake upgrade, as when pushed, I found the car suffered badly from brake fade. I'm not an expert on car mechanics, but I suspect grooved and vented discs should have been fitted on this car as standard to help mitigate this issue.

Our other car is a Ford Mondeo ST. The stereo in this vehicle is fantastic, plenty of bass, and very punchy, with a clear well rounded sound even at low volume. Sadly the Civic's stereo lacks the punch or the clarity of Ford's Sony unit. More noticeable perhaps because of the heavy metal that usually blares loudly whilst I'm driving.

In summary, I would definitely recommend the Type R to anyone looking at a performance hot hatch. Most dealerships now fit the Type R with an aftermarket Tracker at no cost to the owner, although not all do. Buy one from a dealer that does and you'll save yourself £400. Insuring the vehicle at age 29 with 7 years no claims, a clean license, and the tracker (in a nice area of town) and parking my car on the driveway at night has brought my insurance in at £470 per year. Not bad for a group 17 insurance vehicle.

If you are lucky enough to have the money in your early 20s to be buying one of these, *do* check the insurance out before buying. I've heard horror stories of £1700-2500 per year to insure.

I hope this review will be useful to anyone looking seriously at owning one of these. Enjoy.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 28th September, 2008

12th Oct 2008, 13:02

I have had a 2000 Honda Civic V-tec and 98 Civic 1.5, and am a great Honda fan. The Civic Type-R is definitely my new choice. Go Hondaaaa!!!

13th Aug 2009, 05:47

This isn't a very good car first of all...

The lock-to-lock turning circle is very poor on our Australian road.

The car is heavy for a "Type R", which weighs 1345kg.

The car understeers so much when pushing it at corners.

The rear suspension uses a torsion beam setup which is utterly disappointing.

The only good thing about this car is the riding comfort if you're a big fan of the Type-R series; it's still as firm as ever, and most of all the aggressive low-slung frontal looks of the car.

All-in-all I'm very disappointed that we Australians even purchased this vehicle. Honda Australia didn't do a very good job. The EK9 and EP3 Type-R's would've had more fans than this FN2 model.

2008 Honda Civic SE 1.8 vtec from UK and Ireland

Model year2008
Year of manufacture2008
First year of ownership2008
Most recent year of ownership2008
Engine and transmission 1.8 vtec Manual
Performance marks 1 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 1 / 10
Dealer Service marks 0 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 5 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
3.4 / 10
Distance when acquired0 miles
Most recent distance2000 miles
Previous carVolkswagen Golf

Summary:

Expensive considering the poor quality

Faults:

Rattles and squeaks from the cabin, and very low quality overall.

General Comments:

Nothing has gone wrong with the car as such, but the experience as a whole is pretty miserable.

I bought this car as I fancied something that looked a bit different, and in that respect it fits the bill perfectly. However, the quality is really quite appalling considering the price (I could have bought a Golf or 1 Series for the price).

The doors are tinny and the handles especially feel cheap, the dashboard rattles from almost every joint, the most annoying of which is around the tachometer.

The seats are uncomfortable over long distance. I regularly drive from Warwickshire to Yorkshire and feel abused at the end of every journey. I believe that this is due to the head restraints, which are inverted towards the neck, consequently forcing the head down.

Indeed, the car is generally unrefined with a very poor ride and much mechanical noise is present, even at town speed.

The dealership is also pretty obnoxious; when I took the car back after a week of ownership to complain about the paint quality (the bonnet appears to be a different colour to the rest of the car), I was told that I was being fussy.

In summary it is clear that this vehicle has been built to a very low price. I cannot understand how this company achieved a reputation for quality. Based on my experience, I would certainly not recommend buying a car from Honda.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 3rd September, 2008

8th Sep 2008, 15:01

I'm sorry your purchase has turned out so bad. The latest Civic really doesn't seem to be up to normal Honda standards.

Your review is a timely reminder of some basic rules: 1) Always take an extensive test drive of the car - this would have highlighted your issue with the seats 2) Always inspect the car thoroughly (in good daylight) when you are taking delivery - you have control of the situation until you take the keys - I've had to point out dodgy paint jobs on a couple of cars (neither of them Honda's) in the past.

Finally, if you've got a dodgy dealer, let Honda know or try another Honda dealer. I've stuck with Honda for my last 3 cars, as they really do seem to keep tabs on dealer service. Look at the track record of their dealers on the various consumer surveys - they always come out near top.

Good luck - I hope your problems get sorted, and the car grows on you.

15th Sep 2008, 21:45

We had the worst experience with a Civic of any car we ever owned. And that was one that was built in Japan 19 years ago. It was one of the most poorly made cars we've ever seen.

I think Japanese car quality has never been as good as ad hype makes people believe. We've owned both domestic and imports (including 1 German car) and none of our imports came even remotely close to the reliability and build quality of our Ford, GM and Chrysler vehicles.

15th Feb 2009, 07:11

I once owned a 2002 Civic with only 15K miles and still under warranty; the engine rear main leaked oil, took it to the dealer and they refused the warranty repair because I used synthetic oil, so that's it! Traded it in on another brand and NO MORE Honda's for me!

29th Sep 2009, 04:44

Maybe your Hondas are breaking cause you bought your Hondas that were made in the USA? The 90's Hondas were the years that Honda really made their name, but were they built in America or shipped to America?

Oh and by the way nice joke on the Chrysler and GM being reliable, haha very funny, as we all know they're not.

18th Jul 2010, 17:05

I presume that your car is British made?

9th Nov 2010, 14:14

My 2008 Civic engine blew at 36,000 miles, it was replaced and now, less than a month later, my check engine light and tire pressure light are both on. I have had nothing but problems after I hit 30,000 miles. I bought it for gas mileage and reliability. When running, the gas mileage is good. That is about all I have good to say about it.

Average review marks: 6.9 / 10, based on 27 reviews