2001 Renault Clio Reviews

2001 Renault Clio 172 Exclusive 2.0 16v VVT petrol from UK and Ireland

Year of manufacture2001
First year of ownership2011
Most recent year of ownership2011
Engine and transmission 2.0 16v VVT petrol Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.0 / 10
Distance when acquired82000 miles
Most recent distance91000 miles
Previous carSubaru Legacy

Summary:

Fast, fun - and 37 mpg!

Faults:

The (original) battery needed replacing at 90K.

The (also original) exhaust needed new mid and rear sections at 89K. This went from no noise at all - apparently fine - to literally falling off (shearing just in front of the silencer box) within twenty miles on a long journey. Apparently this is common when they do finally go.

General Comments:

This car was the replacement for a 280 bhp Legacy, for which the petrol bills had become monstrous with the price rises recently. I didn't want to lose it, but was forced to sell in the end - so the replacement had a hard job on its hands. That is the background to this review!

I wanted something with some power, also fun to drive, that would be affordable on the petrol.

Having decided on a hot Clio - it scored over other shortlisted possibilities because of the clean, purposeful design - I narrowed it down to a 182 Cup or a phase 1 172. The phase 1 Clio was rather lighter than the phase 2 facelift, and handled more nimbly. The later stripped-out Cup version was an attempt by Renault to replicate the handling of the phase 1 by reducing weight. I drove both, and preferred the driver involvement of the 172; also it was less expensive, so I could afford to replace the cambelt and tyres immediately.

Getting into the car, the leather upholstery is a nice touch that gives a good impression straight away. The dials and controls are well laid-out, and the driving position adjusts well to suit both me (tall, but with short legs) and my wife (just short!). I find it very comfortable on long journeys - even though the ride is firm, the seats are well designed and offer excellent support.

This car is French, so of course you get three separate buttons for the horn! One minor niggle is that there are very few cubby-holes for stowing bits and pieces away, but I have got used to that.

Visibility is excellent all round.

Although there are are only two doors, it is nonetheless easy to manage a small child and a baby with their seats - a big plus.

The car is easy to drive around town, and doesn't mind being an urban run-around when it needs to be. On motorways, it cruises comfortably and has enough power to accelerate out of situations when the need arises, although it starts to run out of serious acceleration at 80 or 85 mph - although of course that's not relevant in the UK! But it comes into its own on B-roads. Once you have become used to the torque steer, it's a joy to drive. The wide track and beautifully thought-out suspension setup make the most of the VVT power band (rather like a turbo boost) that goes from 4000 rpm, but really kicks in at 5000 rpm. It has serious power just where you need it for overtaking, 45 - 60 mph.

In ten months of ownership, it has proved very reliable given its age. It always starts first time, even on icy mornings. And the build quality is much better than I had expected, given Renault's reputation in that department!

All in all, I knew that whatever I had after my Subaru would be a disappointment. But I was wrong. This Clio of course doesn't have the same raw power and speed - or 4WD. But - and I almost feel disloyal saying this - it's very fast all the same, and much more fun to drive. And SO much nicer to look at on the drive!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 5th December, 2011

2001 Renault Clio Renaultsport 172 2.0 16v VVT from UK and Ireland

Year of manufacture2001
First year of ownership2011
Most recent year of ownership2011
Engine and transmission 2.0 16v VVT Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.5 / 10
Distance when acquired82000 miles
Most recent distance82000 miles

Summary:

Must be nearly unbeatable at what it does!

Faults:

The speedometer (and therefore odometer also) didn't work at purchase.

General Comments:

This is an initial review - we've not had the car long, but have been very impressed indeed by it in that short time.

We are a family of four, and worried that we might not get everyone in (including baby seat), but no problem. Not as easy as our estate car, but that's hardly to be expected!

The car strikes a wonderful balance between fun (small with very nimble handling) and power that starts to border on serious performance. It's docile in town, but opens up progressively when needed. Just be a little careful if you're not used to this much power in a light front-wheel-drive car - the steering can be a little bit twitchy when using the full power.

The car also brakes beautifully and turns on a sixpence, and fuel economy nears 40 mpg on normal driving.

I am just over 6 feet tall, and it took me a while to find a good seat position, but I did manage it and am now very comfortable.

Overall this car is great to drive (good in a straight line but best at point-to-point), but is surprisingly comfortable given the firm suspension, with good specification (CD multichanger, trip computer, lumbar support etc) and good economy.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 24th February, 2011

Average review marks: 6.3 / 10, based on 78 reviews