2005 Ford Focus Reviews - Page 6 of 19

2005 Ford Focus ZX4 SE 2.0 PZEV from North America

Model year2005
Year of manufacture2005
First year of ownership2006
Most recent year of ownership2007
Engine and transmission 2.0 PZEV Automatic
Performance marks 9 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Dealer Service marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
9.0 / 10
Distance when acquired27000 miles
Most recent distance53432 miles
Previous carDodge Dakota

Summary:

The Ford Focus is an excellent car

Faults:

I have not had anything go wrong with the car, since I purchased it. It has not even been back to the dealer for adjustments of any kind.

General Comments:

The performance and handling of the 2005 Ford Focus are excellent. The 2.0 four cylinder engine provides peppy performance. Even with the air conditioning on you never get the feeling that the car is underpowered. The low point of the car are the seats. The fabric that is covering the seats looks and feels cheap. I bought my Focus used and the interior was not a big enough shortcoming for me not to buy a Ford Focus.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 27th October, 2007

2005 Ford Focus 2.2 from North America

Model year2005
Year of manufacture2005
First year of ownership2005
Engine and transmission 2.2 Automatic
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 1 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
1.0 / 10
Distance when acquired11 miles
Most recent distance65000 miles
Previous carFord Focus

Summary:

Will never buy a Ford again!!

Faults:

I have had this car for about 2 years 11 months, and I have been going through tires like crazy, and most recently found out that there are some shims that are on the rear axle that wear, causing the rear axle to become unbalanced, causing the car owner to buy several sets of tires to keep this car going. Very upset with Ford; I don't know why Ford doesn't recall all these cars and fix this!!!

General Comments:

This 2005 Ford Focus sucks. Ford should recall this car and fix the rear axle!!!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 25th October, 2007

14th Mar 2008, 13:51

Because Ford doesn't like admitting to common defective failures... there are simply too many to admit to and stay in business. They have taken planned obsolescence to a whole other level. Every Taurus owner in American that's had to replace cooling, transmission, head gaskets, airbag computers, etc should have been compensated. This probably would have bankrupted them because of all the problems though.

Sad the Focus sounds like junk. I like the looks and the availability of a wagon. It replaced the Escort, which was a MUCH better car. I love my Tracer wagon. Ford is stepping two feet into the grave by choice and I'm not sure why. I know they can build good cars, they've done it before! As has Chrysler and GM in the past. No wonder the Big Three are taking such a beating. Don't get cocky guys, you'll lose your shirts and your businesses!

22nd Oct 2008, 12:49

Yes, you've hit it spot on. I agree 100%. The Big Three is in big trouble, so they'd better stop being ass-hats, and start building real cars again.

I recently posted regarding a 2005 Ford Focus ZXW, and it is one of the worst pieces of crap I have ever dealt with. So happy it is not my car! I posted on behalf of someone else.

I will never buy Ford garbage.

2005 Ford Focus Titanium Sport Plus 1,6VCT from Greece

Model year2005
Year of manufacture2005
First year of ownership2006
Most recent year of ownership2007
Engine and transmission 1,6VCT Manual
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 10 / 10
Dealer Service marks 5 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.6 / 10
Distance when acquired0 kilometres
Most recent distance21140 kilometres
Previous carFiat Bravo

Summary:

Excellent car

Faults:

From the moment I took delivery of the car I noticed that the rear wiper wasn't working correctly. If its raining and you switch it on, it doesn't make the whole "wiping" move, instead its working with intervals. I 'm not quite sure is this is really a fault since the owner's manual doesn't exactly describe the way that it's supposed to work.

Also there is a rattling sound coming from the windows when they are fully down.

The color of the front and rear bumpers doesn't exactly match the color of the body, which as I have read in many forums is something that Ford is highly criticised about.

General Comments:

The car handles very nice both on the highway as well as inside the city. The level of sound insulation is great and in the motorway even in high speeds you don't get to hear much, so there is no problem in long trips.

The fuel economy isn't so good, but I drive mostly inside the city. In the open road it has an excellent fuel consumption.

The car feels very solid. It doesn't make any difference if you travel at 120 of at 210km/hour. It is very steady, but due to its size its susceptible to high cross winds. Although the VCT does "do the trick" the acceleration isn't something to be proud of. I feel that the 2.0 would have been a better choice.

The spaces inside is another plus with the boot being able to handle just about anything, and all the seats being very comfortable. The minus is that since I am 1,9metres in height, a person who is above 1,8m will find difficulty in sitting right behind me.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 24th June, 2007

30th Oct 2007, 11:29

I am about making a decision to buy a Ford FOCUS 1.6 16V Ti-VCT (variable valve timing version) which pumps out 113bhp. Economy is central to my decision. Could anyone please tell me what the real world fuel consumption figures for both city and motorway driving are?

Average review marks: 7.4 / 10, based on 57 reviews


Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews